May 2010
Washington State
Department of Health
Proposed Abortion Clinic Certification Policy
Comment posted on WSDH website by
Gerry Parmantier:
Let's get this straight. The ONLY customers of Abortion Clinics are
pregnant women. So the place where they are aborted is to be
certified safe by the largest abortion providing business in the
country (Planned Parenthood) or the abortion industry's political
advocacy group (National Abortion Federation). Professional
standards are just that: across the board and no exceptions and no
conflicts of interest. This kind of rule adds credibility to charges
of genocide made by the recent video Maafa 21. If the goal is
reduction of the numbers of welfare recipients, who cares if
abortion renders such women sterile or dead?
Letter to the
Columbian by Gerry Parmantier:
To the Editor:
The Washington State
Department of Health is proposing a rule entitled Safe And Effective
Analgesia and Anesthesia Administration in Office-Based Surgical
Settings. The rule will require physicians who perform surgery in an
office/clinic setting outside of a hospital to obtain certification
by a professional accrediting organization regarding the safety and
professional standards followed in their office/clinic…except for
abortion clinics which can be certified by Planned Parenthood
America (the largest provider of abortion in the country) or the
National Abortion Federation (an abortion industry lobbyist).
Evidently, the abortion
industry’s clients, all pregnant women, don’t require the same
standard of care as your local plastic surgeon’s office. So call
your local legislator and demand action. Go to
www.clarkrtl.org
and click on Action to learn how you can make a public comment about
the proposed rule before the May 25 deadline. Finally, click on the
Maafa 21 icon on the same website. You won’t ever look at America
with the same eyes again.
|
Feb. 2010
I wrote this [Short
Essay In Defense of Life] in October 2008 and it is a little longer than
I remembered, but I'll let you be the judge on whether you can use any, all,
or part of it. Please feel free to include my name with it.
Thanks again for allowing me to attend the meeting this
evening. It was inspiring to hear about the work yall are doing, and to see
you all in action. Please let me know if I can help.
Yours in Christ,
Vanessa & Danny Amundson
Camas, WA
|
|
Feb. 2010
Dear Senator Pridemore,
As you must know, crisis pregnancy centers
do not ask for taxpayers money from your budget. Rather, individuals
and groups willingly, without coercion, donate to support these
compassionate efforts to help any woman who comes to them.
To try to put them out of business is, I believe, very counter
productive. Rather, we should be supporting them and all their
efforts. Thus, we are asking that you would not support SB 6452.
This is a smoke screen. The pro-abortion businesses fear having
anyone oppose their efforts to get more and more money from more and
more abortions. Let us end this genocide of our next generation.
Mr. and Mrs. R. V. Warren
Vancouver, WA
Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any
people. |
|
January 2010
Senator
Parlette,
I
attended the Hearing on SB-6452 on Wednesday January 27, 2010. This
was the first time that I attended a Senate Hearing. I must say
that I was impressed.
I must, however, agree with the testimony of Senator Zarelli that
this bill imposes potentially stiff penalties on Faith Based
Pregnancy Resource Centers that rely solely on donations and accept
no Federal fund and that operate with a staff that depends heavily
on volunteers while exempting centers offering abortion services or
referrals from the regulations imposed by this Bill. If this Bill
is enacted, I feel that the oversight and penalties should apply to
both sides equally. With the huge deficits facing the State budgets
I am also very concerned about the cost of adding paid staff to
investigate the complaints generated from this Bill.
Listening to the testimony from those supporting this Bill I
couldn't help but feel that these young women, that detailed
complaints against numerous Pregnancy Resource Centers in a large
geographic areas, were searching for some volunteer to make a
misstatement or mistake. I considered that most of the complaints
were subjective evaluations to fit a preconceived agenda and and
were often grossly exaggerated. It was also most disturbing to me
to hear that 4 of the 6 of those testifying in support of this Bill
were paid Planned Parenthood staff persons. I appreciated Senator
Keiser going online to view the web site of the PRC that the Doctor
referred to that made the claim that some web sites link abortion
and breast cancer. I went online myself after the hearing and
numerous sites do make that connection. Some are prestigious cancer
research organizations. So, I don't believe that the PRCs were
dispensing false medical information, some web sites do indeed
report the link between abortion and breast cancer.
I was particularly interested to hear the basis for the concern in
the Bill for the release of confidential medical information. The
story that I heard about the young staff person going in for a
pregnancy test was seated where she could hear the conversation in
the next room between a volunteer and a client. This is not
purposeful release of confidential medical information rather an
unintended miscalculation by the volunteer that seated her there.
When I go to my doctor, I can often hear conversations between
doctors and patients in adjoining clinic rooms. If this is a
purposeful release of confidential medical information, then my HMO
and chiropractor will need to be added to this bill.
I want to thank you for the time and energy that you have spent on
this Hearing Bill and I urge you not to act on SB-6452 and let it
die in Committee.
Sincerely,
Ed Rush
Vancouver, WA
|
|
March 23, 2007 “Amazing Grace” is a film about the struggle in
Parliament to ban the legally protected slave trade in the British
Empire. March 25th marks the 200th anniversary of the success of
that effort. The film’s title comes from a hymn written by John
Newton who had participated in the slave trade until “Grace” opened
his eyes to the humanity of the slaves and the inhumanity of their
treatment.
Two centuries later “Grace” still opens eyes and changes hearts
of participants in contemporary man’s inhumanity to man: legalized
abortion. Two books chronicle the journey of Bernard Nathanson from
abortionist to pro-life advocate: Aborting America (1979) and The
Hand of God: A Journey From Death to Life by the Abortion Doctor Who
Changed His Mind (1997).
Many Africans, chained below deck for weeks, survived the voyage
across the Atlantic Ocean to become slaves in the New World. There
are virtually no survivors of the abortionist’s cutting curette,
vacuum probe and toxic chemical infusions.
Wikipedia.com shows an anti-slavery medallion with the figure of
an African woman in chains and the words: “Am I not a woman and a
sister?” BlackGenocide.org shows pictures of aborted babies. Don’t
mothers and babies deserve better?
Mr. Gerry Parmantier
Vancouver, WA |
|
|